Giving Criticism

A conversation I often have with my son is about taking responsibility for bad behaviors or mistakes. Like all of us, he doesn’t like to be told he’s done something wrong. It doesn’t feel good, and he resists by making excuses or blaming something or someone else. Really anything but raising his hand and taking responsibility.

This behavior is understandable, expected really, in eleven-year-olds. It starts to become really problematic when this behavior is displayed by adult co-workers, however. Working in a place where no one takes responsibility can become toxic, because the inevitable outcome is a blaming, which leads to resentment, which creates a very poor culture indeed.

Telling my son to take responsibility over and over didn’t seem to have much of an impact. I guess he didn’t really see what was in it for him. It made his parents feel better, but why would HE want to do it when it felt so much better to make excuses? I started looking for an argument that a child could understand; something that could help motivate him to take ownership and strive to do better in the future.

Now, before giving him criticism I’ve started asking him, “do you want to feel better, or do you want to BE better?” This makes him stop and think. Even at his age he knows that being good is the goal, so he has started accepting my feedback more easily, as long as it’s given in a constructive and non-judgmental way. Slowly, he’s starting to see feedback the way I do: compliments are candy and criticisms are veggies.

Candy and Vegetables

Compliments feel good in the moment, but they don’t do a thing for you. What’s the value? What’s the takeaway? When you’ve been told that you’ve done a good job, there’s nothing that you can do better next time. Just like candy, you get no benefit from being told what a good job you did other than a happy feeling.

Criticism, on the other hand, doesn’t feel good. We naturally resist it, try to find some way to deflect, nullify, or ignore it all together. But the truth is criticism is the way that we can get better, either through self-criticism or criticism from those who’ve observed our behavior. Learning from our mistakes is only possible if we’re aware and honest with ourselves that a mistake was made. Criticism makes us better, stronger, and wiser.

Just like learning to eat your veggies, one can become better at accepting criticism and we can help others become better at accepting it as well. To paraphrase Gordon Gecko, “Criticism is good,” and it needs to be seen in this light. Here are a few of the things that I’ve noticed make criticism easier for myself to accept, and have seemed to work for others:

Be Positive

Just because something went wrong, doesn’t mean that the tone of the feedback needs to be negative. In the end, we can focus on punishing a mistake or we can focus on the better, more glorious future in which this mistake is no longer made. Tone makes a world of difference when delivering criticism.

Focus on the Behavior

One of the biggest problems with giving criticism is all of the unnecessary, unhelpful things that get thrown in along with it. The most helpful feedback in the world isn’t going to get through if the point is lost amid personal attacks, and hindsight. The only thing that truly matters is that the cause of the mistake is understood and it can be avoided in the future. That’s it!! Everything else is besides the point, and clouds the issue.

Model Responsibility

Nothing else matters, if you as the leader don’t show the team how it should work. If you find yourself in a culture of blame-shifting, be the change. Actively seek out opportunities to own mistakes, loudly and publicly take responsibility, and let everyone know what went wrong and how things will be different going forward. For team members to see that owning a mistake doesn’t entail being blamed, that, in the case of a genuine mistake, there are no real consequences, and that this is how leaders behave, it can make a world of difference.

A Better Way

A team where there’s no responsibility is a dangerous place. Mistakes may be hidden for fear of the associated blame, investigation into root causes might be poorly done for fear of what might be found, and there can be no trust because you know your teammate will pin the blame on you if anything goes wrong. In this situation mistakes are still going to happen, there’s just very little chance that anyone will learn from them.

Creating a culture where there is no fear of blame doesn’t mean a culture where mistakes are OK. No one wants to make mistakes, and if you make it easy and safe to learn from them, then they’ll become less frequent not more. Your people will feel more secure without the threat of blame hanging over their every action, the team will grow as they learn from their experience instead of hiding it, and genuine trust will form as criticism can then be seen as a beneficial action by a helpful colleague instead of an attempt to tear you down.

Learning to give and receive constructive criticism is one of the most beneficial, and least observed, leadership skills that I know. If done properly, it can mean the difference between leading through respect, and leading through fear.

Integrity

I’m a dedicated listener to NPR, and if you are as well you will have noticed that this week they started their semi-annual fund drive. The hosts were asking people to donate while mentioning that only a tiny fraction of habitual, dedicated listeners actually do, and it got me thinking about integrity.

I consider integrity as doing what’s right, even when it’s inconvenient. It’s such a simple definition and ideal, but such a difficult one to live. All of those millions of people listening to NPR tell themselves comforting excuses about how they can’t really afford a donation right now, but will definitely give in the future. There are no consequences for this behavior. Others
have  always stepped up in the past, and NPR has continued on without their involvement. It’s so easy! The only reason to actually give, is that it’s the right thing to do.

Integrity has a civil engineering definition as well, referring to the structural strength of an object; how likely is it to fail under stress. I find this definition enlightening. A wall with structural integrity doesn’t fail when hit by a storm, just like a leader with personal integrity, real integrity, doesn’t fail under stress. Even when things are hard, even when no one would ever know, they are still much more likely to do the right thing.


Integrity is doing what’s right, even when it’s inconvenient

Underlying Issues

Have you ever been in a meeting with management and been tempted to take credit for an idea developed by someone on your team, or to duck responsibility for a mistake? The team member who came up with the diea isn’t there; they would probably never find out. That mistake was REALLY more of a team effort; lots of people could have done things better. Do thoughts like these go through your mind in moments of stress and accountability?

You can tell yourself that it’s just this one time, but it never is. These thoughts, these excuses that we tell ourselves aren’t the real problem, they’re symptoms. If you would consider taking more credit than you really deserve, it indicates the wrong mindset. It’s a sign of putting yourself before the team. Avoiding responsibility for a mistake the team made indicates insecurity. Maybe you’re afraid of criticism. These are underlying issues that can seriously eat away at a leader’s credibility and the team’s effectiveness.

Priorities -> Goals -> Behaviors

It’s critical to always be honest with yourself and to critically analyze your motivations. Your priorities dictate your goals, and your goals dictate your behaviors. If you consciously put the team first, then you’re much less likely to do something to compromise that like stealing credit or redirecting blame.

Integral Leadership

These little things are so important, because, like a wall, any act that lacks integrity, compromises the integrity of the whole. Take a single brick out of the strongest wall, and it becomes ever so much weaker and leaves a gap that makes it much easier to take another brick, and another… Eventually, what seemed like such a small thing that could never hurt such a sturdy wall, has caused it to become frail, full of holes, and ready to fall down at the smallest stress. Your personal integrity works the same way.

Don’t kid yourself to think that no one will notice these lapses. Everyone knows a leader with integrity; it’s in everything they do. A leader who genuinely puts his team first has an undefinable credibility with the team that cannot be bought any other way.

A team led by a genuine leader is like a highly trained special operations team instead of a group of hired mercenaries. Team members won’t hesitate to sacrifice themselves for the team and a leader who would do the same, while the mercenaries will scatter when things get hard. It can be hard to tell what kind of team it is when things are going well, but the difference is night and day the moment there’s a problem.

I have personally struggled with owning mistakes in the past, and every instance where I compromised my integrity haunts me. Each was an opportunity for genuine leadership lost, an opportunity to set the example for my team and learn from the mistake wasted. I now make a conscious effort to recognize this behavior, try to realize when I am engaging in it, and to hold myself accountable. Even more, I try to work on the underlying issues that cause me to engage in this behavior in the first place. It’s a struggle, but trying to make myself better and holding myself to a higher standard is the only way I can ask the same of my team.

It’s All Your Fault

What is the single most important quality that defines a leader? Leadership has been a source of debate for centuries, from the “Great Man” theory, to Management theory, to Relationship theory. Where does leadership come from? Can it be taught? What defines it? Most people think of leadership in the words of Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, “I know it when I see it.”

What it’s not

No matter how Hollywood portrays it, or politicians pretend it is, leadership is not power and power is not leadership. The CEO may run around pointing fingers, making excuses, and being indecisive when the project is on fire while the intern is calmly asking the right questions and creating a plan of action.

A director may sit in an executive meeting taking credit for their team’s long hours, hard work, and brilliant insights while blaming them for any shortcomings while the project manager next to him heaps praise on the team and takes responsibility for the delays.

Powerful people display a distinct lack of leadership every day, and their subordinates often rise to fill the vacuum that is left behind. Leadership can come from anywhere. At its core, I believe it only requires a single thing…

Responsibility

Responsibility means ownership. Ownership of problems and ownership of mistakes. It means a lot of other things as well, but these are the two I want to focus on today.

Owning a problem doesn’t mean working on a piece of it, handing it off to someone else, and then considering your part done. Ownership means asking the questions to understand the whole problem, putting together a plan to resolve it, and making sure that every part of that plan is being executed. It means tracking what tasks are still in process, and continuously following up to make sure that the tasks aren’t being blocked, and if they are help remove the blockers. Owning a problem doesn’t mean fixing everything yourself, it means coordinating all of the fixes and tracking them until completion.

Owning mistakes doesn’t just mean taking the blame for everything that goes wrong on a project. It means asking the questions to understand what went wrong, putting together a plan to prevent it from happening again, and following up to make sure that the plan is being implemented. Every mistake made on the team could be prevented by the right process, the right training, the right communication, or the right plan. All things that the leader is responsible for. If you have the wrong people on your team, then it’s your responsibility for hiring them. If you have people on your team who cannot be trained or aren’t contributing, then it’s the leader’s responsibility for getting them off of the team.

Somebody has to do it

Responsibility isn’t just some evil that is the price to pay for leadership. Real leaders seek it out. They understand that unless someone owns the problem, it’s not going to get fixed; unless someone owns the mistake, it’ll keep happening. They want to be the ones who put their necks and reputations on the line to get things done and to solve the problems.

If your hand doesn’t go up when it comes time to solve the hard problems, if you don’t want to get involved because you’re afraid you might make a mistake, if you’re relieved when someone else steps forward and takes the burden, then leadership isn’t for you. Real leadership isn’t glamorous and powerful, it’s dirty, hard, and selfless.

Ask me to find the leader on a team, and I don’t immediately look at the person in charge. I look for the person who takes responsibility, volunteers for the thankless tasks that it takes to make the team succeed, and that person could be anyone.